↓ Skip to main content

Smoking, smoking cessation and tobacco control in rural China: a qualitative study in Shandong Province

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Smoking, smoking cessation and tobacco control in rural China: a qualitative study in Shandong Province
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-916
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Wang, Chenghui Li, Chongqi Jia, Yanxun Liu, Junjie Liu, Xiaona Yan, Yufeng Fang

Abstract

Smoking prevalence is high in China and even higher among rural residents. The aims of this study were: 1) to gain insights into the motivations of tobacco use and barriers to smoking cessation among rural village residents; 2) to understand the current tobacco control measures in the rural villages and barriers encountered or perceived for implementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,883,767
of 24,051,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,249
of 15,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,402
of 242,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#116
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,051,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.