↓ Skip to main content

Global distribution of malaria-resistant MHC-HLA alleles: the number and frequencies of alleles and malaria risk

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global distribution of malaria-resistant MHC-HLA alleles: the number and frequencies of alleles and malaria risk
Published in
Malaria Journal, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-349
Pubmed ID
Authors

László Zsolt Garamszegi

Abstract

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is the most polymorphic genetic region in vertebrates, but the origin of such genetic diversity remains unresolved. Several studies have demonstrated at the within-population level that individuals harbouring particular alleles can be less or more susceptible to malaria, but these do not allow strong generalization.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor 5 7%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,296,085
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,534
of 6,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,510
of 250,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#66
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.