You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Instrumentation issues in implementation science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-014-0118-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruben G Martinez, Cara C Lewis, Bryan J Weiner |
| Abstract |
Like many new fields, implementation science has become vulnerable to instrumentation issues that potentially threaten the strength of the developing knowledge base. For instance, many implementation studies report findings based on instruments that do not have established psychometric properties. This article aims to review six pressing instrumentation issues, discuss the impact of these issues on the field, and provide practical recommendations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 18% |
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 298 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 19% |
| Researcher | 52 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 20% |
| Unknown | 48 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 57 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 57 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,359,762
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#467
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,932
of 250,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.