↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative factors proposed to influence the prevalence of canine tick-borne disease agents in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative factors proposed to influence the prevalence of canine tick-borne disease agents in the United States
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger W Stich, Byron L Blagburn, Dwight D Bowman, Christopher Carpenter, M Roberto Cortinas, Sidney A Ewing, Desmond Foley, Janet E Foley, Holly Gaff, Graham J Hickling, R Ryan Lash, Susan E Little, Catherine Lund, Robert Lund, Thomas N Mather, Glen R Needham, William L Nicholson, Julia Sharp, Andrea Varela-Stokes, Dongmei Wang

Abstract

The Companion Animal Parasite Council hosted a meeting to identify quantifiable factors that can influence the prevalence of tick-borne disease agents among dogs in North America. This report summarizes the approach used and the factors identified for further analysis with mathematical models of canine exposure to tick-borne pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 7 18%
Professor 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,124,411
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#375
of 5,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,765
of 249,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#9
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.