You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutrition interventions at point-of-sale to encourage healthier food purchasing: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-919 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Selma C Liberato, Ross Bailie, Julie Brimblecombe |
| Abstract |
Point-of-sale is a potentially important opportunity to promote healthy eating through nutrition education and environment modification. The aim of this review was to describe and review the evidence of effectiveness of various types of interventions that have been used at point-of-sale to encourage purchase and/or eating of healthier food and to improve health outcomes, and the extent to which effectiveness was related to intensity, duration and intervention setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 17% |
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,327,415
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,788
of 15,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,891
of 239,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#63
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.