↓ Skip to main content

Self-reported contacts for mental health problems by rural residents: predicted service needs, facilitators and barriers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-reported contacts for mental health problems by rural residents: predicted service needs, facilitators and barriers
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0249-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tonelle E Handley, Frances J Kay-Lambkin, Kerry J Inder, Terry J Lewin, John R Attia, Jeffrey Fuller, David Perkins, Clare Coleman, Natasha Weaver, Brian J Kelly

Abstract

Rural and remote Australians face a range of barriers to mental health care, potentially limiting the extent to which current services and support networks may provide assistance. This paper examines self-reported mental health problems and contacts during the last 12 months, and explores cross-sectional associations between potential facilitators/barriers and professional and non-professional help-seeking, while taking into account expected associations with socio-demographic and health-related factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Social Sciences 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,919,373
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,916
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,111
of 238,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#41
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.