↓ Skip to main content

Early identification of women at risk of postpartum depression using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a sample of Lebanese women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early identification of women at risk of postpartum depression using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a sample of Lebanese women
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0242-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charline El-Hachem, Jihane Rohayem, Rami Bou Khalil, Sami Richa, Assaad Kesrouani, Rima Gemayel, Norma Aouad, Najat Hatab, Eliane Zaccak, Nancy Yaghi, Salimé Salameh, Elie Attieh

Abstract

During the postpartum period, women are vulnerable to depression affecting about 10 to 20% of mothers during the first year after delivery. However, only 50% of women with prominent symptoms are diagnosed with postpartum depression (PPD). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most widely used screening instrument for PPD . The main objectives of this study are to assess whether an EPDS score of 9 or more on day 2 (D2) postpartum is predictive of a depressive episode between days 30 and 40 postpartum (D30-40), to determine the risk factors as well as the prevalence of PPD in a sample of Lebanese women and to determine a threshold score of EPDS predictive of PPD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 224 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 16%
Lecturer 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 75 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 56 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 17%
Psychology 27 12%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 78 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,378,085
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,866
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,254
of 238,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#68
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.