↓ Skip to main content

Specialized inpatient treatment of adult anorexia nervosa: effectiveness and clinical significance of changes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Specialized inpatient treatment of adult anorexia nervosa: effectiveness and clinical significance of changes
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0258-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Schlegl, Norbert Quadflieg, Bernd Löwe, Ulrich Cuntz, Ulrich Voderholzer

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies have predominantly evaluated the effectiveness of inpatient treatment for anorexia nervosa at the group level. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes at an individual level based on the clinical significance of improvement. Patients¿ treatment outcomes were classified into four groups: deteriorated, unchanged, reliably improved and clinically significantly improved. Furthermore, the study set out to explore predictors of clinically significant changes in eating disorder psychopathology.MethodsA total of 435 inpatients were assessed at admission and at discharge on the following measures: body-mass-index, eating disorder symptoms, general psychopathology, depression and motivation for change.Results20.0-32.0% of patients showed reliable changes and 34.1-55.3% showed clinically significant changes in the various outcome measures. Between 23.0% and 34.5% remained unchanged and between 1.7% and 3.0% deteriorated. Motivation for change and depressive symptoms were identified as positive predictors of clinically significant changes in eating disorder psychopathology, whereas body dissatisfaction, impulse regulation, social insecurity and education were negative predictors.ConclusionsDespite high rates of reliable and clinically significant changes following intensive inpatient treatment, about one third of anorexia nervosa patients showed no significant response to treatment. Future studies should focus on the identification of non-responders as well as on the development of treatment strategies for these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,201,896
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,382
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,340
of 238,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#29
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.