Title |
Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-308 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hillary Bracken, Shuchita Mundle, Brian Faragher, Thomas Easterling, Alan Haycox, Mark Turner, Zarko Alfirevic, Beverly Winikoff, Andrew Weeks |
Abstract |
Between 40,000 and 80,000 pregnant women die annually from pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Although magnesium sulphate and anti-hypertensive therapies can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with pre-eclampsia, the only cure comes with delivery. Prompt delivery of the baby, preferably by vaginal route, is vital in order to achieve good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Induction of labour is therefore a critical intervention in order to prevent morbidity to both mother and baby. Two low cost interventions - oral misoprostol tablets and transcervical Foley catheterization - are already used by some in low resource settings, but their relative risks and benefits are not known. The trial will compare the risks, benefits, and trade-offs in efficacy, safety, acceptability and cost of misoprostol and Foley catheter for induction in women with preeclampsia or uncontrolled hypertension. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 20% |
Researcher | 19 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 15% |
Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 47 | 33% |