↓ Skip to main content

Legal themes concerning obesity regulation in the United States: Theory and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Health Review, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Legal themes concerning obesity regulation in the United States: Theory and practice
Published in
Australian Health Review, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1743-8462-5-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

James G Hodge, Andrea M Garcia, Supriya Shah

Abstract

Despite national health objectives to reduce the incidence of obesity to 15% of the population by 2010, public health data suggest that the incidence of obesity in the United States is actually increasing. The U.S. recognizes that it (like other industrialized countries) faces an epidemic of obesity and related health conditions. How can U.S. jurisdictions (federal, state, and local) and the private sector respond to this epidemic through laws and policies that are directly or indirectly designed to address obesity? This article analyzes the theoretical and practical roles of law as a tool to curb obesity in the U.S. It proffers ten major legal themes to address obesity among the U.S. population, including: (1) use of incentives to encourage healthier behaviors; (2) use of financial disincentives to discourage unhealthy behaviors; (3) requirements to improve food quality, diversity, or availability; (4) compensation for injured persons seeking recourse; (5) restriction of access to unhealthy foods; (6) regulations aimed at influencing consumer choices; (7) control of marketing and advertising; (8) creation of communities that support healthy lifestyles; (9) physical education/fitness requirements; and (10) insurance coverage mandates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Taiwan 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Psychology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%