You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J Major, Rebecca L Stine, Craig W Heckathorne, Stefania Fatone, Steven A Gard |
| Abstract |
Current upper limb prostheses do not replace the active degrees-of-freedom distal to the elbow inherent to intact physiology. Limited evidence suggests that transradial prosthesis users demonstrate shoulder and trunk movements to compensate for these missing volitional degrees-of-freedom. The purpose of this study was to enhance understanding of the effects of prosthesis use on motor performance by comparing the movement quality of upper body kinematics between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks that reflect activities of daily living. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 48 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#272
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,742
of 250,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.