↓ Skip to main content

A round robin approach to the analysis of bisphenol a (BPA) in human blood samples

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A round robin approach to the analysis of bisphenol a (BPA) in human blood samples
Published in
Environmental Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-13-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura N Vandenberg, Roy R Gerona, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Julia A Taylor, Richard B van Breemen, Carrie A Dickenson, Chunyang Liao, Yang Yuan, Retha R Newbold, Vasantha Padmanabhan, Frederick S vom Saal, Tracey J Woodruff

Abstract

Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) is ubiquitous, yet there are concerns about whether BPA can be measured in human blood. This Round Robin was designed to address this concern through three goals: 1) to identify collection materials, reagents and detection apparatuses that do not contribute BPA to serum; 2) to identify sensitive and precise methods to accurately measure unconjugated BPA (uBPA) and BPA-glucuronide (BPA-G), a metabolite, in serum; and 3) to evaluate whether inadvertent hydrolysis of BPA-G occurs during sample handling and processing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Professor 5 7%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Chemistry 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,941,217
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#378
of 1,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,053
of 226,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.