↓ Skip to main content

Recent progress in the development of anti-malarial quinolones

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent progress in the development of anti-malarial quinolones
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard M Beteck, Frans J Smit, Richard K Haynes, David D N’Da

Abstract

Available anti-malarial tools have over the ten-year period, 2002 to 2012, dramatically reduced the number of fatalities attributed to malaria, from one million to less than six-hundred and thirty thousand. Although fewer people recently die from malaria, emerging resistance to the first-line anti-malarial drugs, namely artemisinins in combination with quinolines and arylmethanols, necessitates the urgent development of new anti-malarial drugs to curb the disease. The quinolones remain a promising class of compounds, with some demonstrating strong in vitro activity against the malaria parasite. This review presents the progress made in the development of potential anti-malarial quinolones, since 2008. The efficacy of these compounds against both asexual blood stages and other stages of the malaria parasite, the nature of putative targets, and a comparison of these properties with anti-malarial drugs currently in clinical use, are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Burkina Faso 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2015.
All research outputs
#12,902,902
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,162
of 5,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,693
of 236,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#50
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.