You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal adenoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-016-2685-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feifei Yu, Yibin Guo, Hao Wang, Jian Feng, Zhichao Jin, Qi Chen, Yu Liu, Jia He |
| Abstract |
To summarize the relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and risk of colorectal adenomas (CRA), we performed a meta-analysis of observational studies. To find studies, we searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and conference abstracts and related publications for American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology. Studies that reported relative risks (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between T2DM and risk of CRA were included. The meta-analysis assessed the relationships between T2DM and risk of CRA. Sensitivity analyses were performed in two ways: (1) by omitting each study iteratively and (2) by keeping high-quality studies only. Publication bias was detected by Egger's and Begg's tests and corrected using the trim and fill method. This meta-analysis included 17 studies with 28,999 participants and 6798 CRA cases. We found that T2DM was a risk factor for CRA (RR: 1.52; 95 % CI: 1.29-1.80), and also for the advanced adenoma (RR: 1.41; 95 % CI: 1.06-1.87). Patients with existing T2DM (RR: 1.56; 95 % CI: 1.16-2.08) or newly diagnosed T2DM (RR: 1.51; 95 % CI: 1.16-1.97) have a risk of CRA. Similar significant results were found in retrospective studies (RR: 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.30-1.89) and population based cross-sectional studies (RR: 1.46; 95 % CI: 1.21-1.89), but not in prospective studies (RR: 1.27; 95 % CI: 0.77-2.10). Our results suggested that T2DM plays a risk role in the risk of developing CRA. Consequently, medical workers should increase the rate of CRA screening for T2DM patients so that they can benefit from behavioural interventions that can help prevent the development of colorectal cancer. Additional, large prospective cohort studies are needed to make a more convincing case for these associations. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,448,386
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,530
of 8,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,737
of 343,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#206
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.