You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional principal component analysis as a new methodology for the analysis of the impact of two rehabilitation protocols in functional recovery after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Luz Sánchez-Sánchez, Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois, Silvia Mena-del Horno, Enrique Viosca-Herrero, Beatriz Gisbert-Morant, Celedonia Igual-Camacho, Ignacio Bermejo-Bosch |
| Abstract |
This study addressed the problem of evaluating the effectiveness of two protocols of physiotherapy for functional recovery after stroke. In particular, the study explored the use of Functional Principal Component Analysis (FPCA), a multivariate data analysis in order to assess and clarify the process of regaining independence after stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,264
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,637
of 250,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.