↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of the rs2802292 SNP identifies FOXO3Aas a modifier locus predicting cancer risk in patients with PJS and PHTS hamartomatous polyposis syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of the rs2802292 SNP identifies FOXO3Aas a modifier locus predicting cancer risk in patients with PJS and PHTS hamartomatous polyposis syndromes
Published in
BMC Cancer, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanna Forte, Valentina Grossi, Valentina Celestini, Giuseppe Lucisano, Marco Scardapane, Dora Varvara, Margherita Patruno, Rosanna Bagnulo, Daria Loconte, Laura Giunti, Antonio Petracca, Sabrina Giglio, Maurizio Genuardi, Fabio Pellegrini, Nicoletta Resta, Cristiano Simone

Abstract

Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes (HPS) are inherited conditions associated with high cancer risk. They include the Peutz-Jeghers and the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes, which are caused by mutations in the LKB1 and PTEN genes, respectively. Estimation of cancer risk is crucial in order to optimize surveillance, but no prognostic markers are currently available for these conditions. Our study relies on a 'signal transduction' hypothesis based on the crosstalk between LKB1/AMPK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt signaling at the level of the tumor suppressor protein FoxO3A. Interestingly, the FOXO3A rs2802292 G-allele was shown to be associated with longevity, reduced risk of aging-related diseases and increased expression of FoxO3A mRNA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 44%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,200,249
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,353
of 8,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,879
of 238,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#63
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,277 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.