↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic comparison between treatments for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: study protocol of a randomized prospective and controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic comparison between treatments for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: study protocol of a randomized prospective and controlled trial
Published in
BMC Women's Health, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12905-017-0414-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata A. Belotto, Maria Cristina Chavantes, João Paulo Tardivo, Roberto Euzébio dos Santos, Raquel Civolani Marques Fernandes, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana, Christiane Pavani, Daniela Fátima Teixeira da Silva

Abstract

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a lymphocyte-mediated disease of unknown etiology that can cause intense itching as well stenosis, hindering the evacuation and urination. It can also limit the sex life due to severe local pruritus, pain and dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse). The standard treatment for this disease is the use of topical corticosteroids to reduce the clinical symptoms and to try to increase disease-free intervals. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a treatment that associates a light radiation with a photosensitizing agent and photobiomodulation (PBM) are therapies that can promote effective immunomodulatory responses at the application site by means of photophysical and photochemical phenomena from the molecular to the systemic level, which promote their use in chronic dermatoses. The aim is to compare the effects of PDT, PBM, and topical corticosteroid in VLS evaluating clinical, histological, immunohistochemical and spectroscopic responses. The study is prospective, randomized and controlled, in a population of 60 women with histological diagnoses of VLS. There will be 3 treatments groups: PDT, PBM and topical corticosteroid (control group), where will be allocated by randomization 20 patients in each one. The clinical course will be monitored by measuring local temperature, itching, atrophy, and the area of the lesion. Histologically, the slides will be classified and will have the ordering of collagen fibers quantified. Immunohistochemical analysis will be done using the markers IFN-γ, TGF-β, CD4, CD8, IL-1, p53 and Ki-67. Finally, the spectroscopic evaluation will be done by reflectance. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses will be conducted to compare the groups and make associations between different responses. The study is an open-label for patients with active symptomatic disease with a period of 1 year follow-up to determine the rate of recurrence in each groups. The immunological effects of PDT and PBM are described by several authors in inflammatory skin diseases, stimulating the production and organization of the associated collagen. Thus, it is reasonable to determine the efficacy and safety of these new treatments in VLS, in comparison to the control group, analyzing the recurrence time, the impact on the optical properties of the skin, and the benefit to patients. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02416531 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 20%
Student > Master 11 14%
Other 9 11%
Professor 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#17,916,739
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,443
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,899
of 317,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#24
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.