↓ Skip to main content

Why do some physicians in Portuguese-speaking African countries work exclusively for the private sector? Findings from a mixed-methods study

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why do some physicians in Portuguese-speaking African countries work exclusively for the private sector? Findings from a mixed-methods study
Published in
Human Resources for Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-12-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuliano Russo, Bruno de Sousa, Mohsin Sidat, Paulo Ferrinho, Gilles Dussault

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in the private health sector in low- and middle-income countries, little is known about physicians working outside the public sector. The present work adopts a mixed-methods approach to explore characteristics, working patterns, choices, and motivations of the physicians working exclusively for the private sector in the capital cities of Cape Verde, Guinea Bissau, and Mozambique. The paper's objective is to contribute to the understanding of such physicians, ultimately informing the policies regulating the medical profession in low- and middle-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 4 5%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 9%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#708
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,097
of 250,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.