↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction of freehand 3D ultrasound based on kernel regression

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstruction of freehand 3D ultrasound based on kernel regression
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-13-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiankang Chen, Tiexiang Wen, Xingmin Li, Wenjian Qin, Donglai Lan, Weizhou Pan, Jia Gu

Abstract

Freehand three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound has the advantages of flexibility for allowing cliniciansto manipulate the ultrasound probe over the examined body surface with less constraint in comparisonwith other scanning protocols. Thus it is widely used in clinical diagnose and image-guided surgery.However, as the data scanning of freehand¿style is subjective, the collected B-scan images are usuallyirregular and highly sparse. One of the key procedures in freehand ultrasound imaging system is thevolume reconstruction, which plays an important role in improving the reconstructed image quality.System and MethodsA novel freehand 3D ultrasound volume reconstruction method based on kernel regression model isproposed in this paper. Our method consists of two steps: bin-filling and regression. Firstly, thebin-filling step is used to map each pixel in the sampled B-scan images to its corresponding voxelin the reconstructed volume data. Secondly, the regression step is used to make the nonparametricestimation for the whole volume data from the previous sampled sparse data. The kernel penalizesdistance away from the current approximation center within a local neighborhood.Experiments and resultsTo evaluate the quality and performance of our proposed kernel regression algorithm for freehand 3Dultrasound reconstruction, a phantom and an in-vivo liver organ of human subject are scanned with ourfreehand 3D ultrasound imaging system. Root mean square error (RMSE) is used for the quantitativeevaluation. Both of the qualitative and quantitative experimental results demonstrate that our methodcan reconstruct image with less artifacts and higher quality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 67 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 35%
Computer Science 23 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,305,567
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#424
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,558
of 236,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.