You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Post-carotid stenting reperfusion injury with blood-brain barrier disruption on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR MRI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12883-014-0178-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hyun-Ji Cho, Young Jin Kim, Joon Hwa Lee, Jin Woo Choi, Won-Jin Moon, Hong Gee Roh, Young Il Chun, Hahn Young Kim |
| Abstract |
BackgroundFollowing carotid revascularization, an abrupt increase in cerebral blood flow may disrupt the blood¿brain barrier, resulting in reperfusion injury. This damage to the blood¿brain barrier may be reflected by subarachnoid enhancement on FLAIR MRI after gadolinium injection.Case presentationThe authors present two cases of post-carotid stenting reperfusion injury that showed hyperintensity in the subarachnoid spaces on FLAIR MRI after gadolinium injection.ConclusionThese MRI findings may represent a marker for reperfusion injury after carotid revascularization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 60% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,378,085
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,881
of 2,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,436
of 238,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#29
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.