Reimbursement of orphan drugs in Belgium: what (else) matters?
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
Eline Picavet, David Cassiman, Steven Simoens
BackgroundMost orphan drugs do not meet traditional standards of cost-effectiveness. Yet, most orphan drugs are reimbursed, which implies that other factors are taken into account at the time of reimbursement. To increase accountability of decision-makers, there is a need for more transparency in the factors that play a role in reimbursement decisions of orphan drugs. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use a combination of qualitative research methods to examine which official and non-official factors influence reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs in Belgium.MethodsSix semi-structured interviews with past or present members of the Drug Reimbursement Committee (DRC) were performed with a view to obtaining an overview of the potential factors influencing reimbursement. Additionally, these presence of these factors was assessed in the reimbursement dossiers of all orphan drugs (n¿=¿64) for which an application for reimbursement was submitted to the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance in Belgium between January 2002 and July 2013.ResultsDifferent official (i.e. therapeutic value, budget impact, price and impact in clinical practice) and non-official factors (i.e. pricing and reimbursement in other countries, interference by patient organisations and experts, arguments related to quality of branded drug versus compounding, media attention, innovative character, economic importance, ethical arguments and the political climate) may have influenced past reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs in Belgium.DiscussionThe identification of factors influencing orphan drug reimbursement is a crucial step in the development of a transparent and consistent framework which will guide future decision-making for reimbursement of orphan drugs.
|Members of the public||3||75%|
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||24||23%|
|Student > Bachelor||9||9%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||28||27%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||22||21%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||6||6%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||5||5%|