Title |
Development of a standard operating procedure and checklist for rapid sequence induction in the critically ill
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13049-014-0041-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Brendon Sherren, Stephen Tricklebank, Guy Glover |
Abstract |
IntroductionRapid sequence induction (RSI) of critically ill patients outside of theatres is associated with a higher risk of hypoxia, cardiovascular collapse and death. In the prehospital and military environments, there is an increasing awareness of the benefits of standardised practice and checklists.MethodsWe conducted a non-systematic review of literature pertaining to key components of RSI preparation and management. A standard operating procedure (SOP) for in-hospital RSI was developed based on this and experience from large teaching hospital anaesthesia and critical care departments.ResultsThe SOP consists of a RSI equipment set-up sheet, pre-RSI checklist and failed airway algorithm. The SOP should improve RSI preparation, crew resource management and first pass intubation success while minimising adverse events.ConclusionBased on the presented literature, we believe the evidence is sufficient to recommend adoption of the core components in the suggested SOP. This standardised approach to RSI in the critically ill may reduce the current high incidence of adverse events and hopefully improve patient outcomes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 25 | 33% |
United States | 5 | 7% |
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 51 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
Scientists | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 164 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Researcher | 16 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
Other | 37 | 22% |
Unknown | 37 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 52% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 45 | 26% |