You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Rating general practitioner consultation performance in cancer care: does the specialty of assessors matter? A simulated patient study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moyez Jiwa, Georgia Halkett, Xingqiong Meng, Melissa Berg |
| Abstract |
Patients treated for prostate cancer may present to general practitioners (GPs) for treatment follow up, but may be reticent to have their consultations recorded. Therefore the use of simulated patients allows practitioner consultations to be rated. The aim of this study was to determine whether the speciality of the assessor has an impact on how GP consultation performance is rated. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |