↓ Skip to main content

A student-centered approach for developing active learning: the construction of physical models as a teaching tool in medical physiology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A student-centered approach for developing active learning: the construction of physical models as a teaching tool in medical physiology
Published in
BMC Medical Education, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flávio Moura Rezende-Filho, Lucas José Sá da Fonseca, Valéria Nunes-Souza, Glaucevane da Silva Guedes, Luiza Antas Rabelo

Abstract

Teaching physiology, a complex and constantly evolving subject, is not a simple task. A considerable body of knowledge about cognitive processes and teaching and learning methods has accumulated over the years, helping teachers to determine the most efficient way to teach, and highlighting student's active participation as a means to improve learning outcomes. In this context, this paper describes and qualitatively analyzes an experience of a student-centered teaching-learning methodology based on the construction of physiological-physical models, focusing on their possible application in the practice of teaching physiology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Suriname 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Unspecified 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 29 32%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Unspecified 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 24 27%