↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: The role of ultrasound in estimating extra-vascular lung water

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: The role of ultrasound in estimating extra-vascular lung water
Published in
Critical Care, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc12710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Murali Shyamsundar, Benjamin Attwood, Liza Keating, Andrew P Walden

Abstract

The estimation of extra-vascular lung water (EVLW) is an essential component in the assessment of critically ill patients. EVLW is independently associated with mortality and its manipulation has been shown to improve outcome. Accurate assessment of lung water is possible with CT and MR imaging but these are impractical for real-time measurement in sick patients and have been superseded by single thermal dilution techniques. While useful, single thermo-dilution requires repeated calibration and is prone to error, suggesting a need for other monitoring methods. Traditionally the lung was not thought amenable to ultrasound examination owing to the high acoustic impedance of air; however, the identification of artefacts in diseased lung has led to increased use of ultrasound as a point of care investigation for both diagnosis and to monitor response to interventions. Following the initial description of B-lines in association with increased lung water, accumulating evidence has shown that they are a useful and responsive measure of the presence and dynamic changes in EVLW. Animal models have confirmed a correlation with lung gravimetry and the utility of B-lines has been demonstrated in many clinical situations and correlated against other established measures of EVLW. With increasing availability and expertise the role of ultrasound in estimating EVLW should be embedded in clinical practice and incorporated into clinical algorithms to aid decision making. This review looks at the evidence for ultrasound as a valid, easy to use, non-invasive point of care investigation to assess EVLW.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 126 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 26 19%
Researcher 22 16%
Other 18 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 71%
Computer Science 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,957,915
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,472
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,117
of 210,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#19
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.