↓ Skip to main content

Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1038 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel L Pullan, Jennifer L Smith, Rashmi Jasrasaria, Simon J Brooker

Abstract

Quantifying the burden of parasitic diseases in relation to other diseases and injuries requires reliable estimates of prevalence for each disease and an analytic framework within which to estimate attributable morbidity and mortality. Here we use data included in the Global Atlas of Helminth Infection to derive new global estimates of numbers infected with intestinal nematodes (soil-transmitted helminths, STH: Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and the hookworms) and use disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) to estimate disease burden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Ecuador 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1323 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 231 17%
Student > Bachelor 194 14%
Researcher 134 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 10%
Student > Postgraduate 66 5%
Other 213 16%
Unknown 372 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 252 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 178 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 121 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 112 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 6%
Other 207 15%
Unknown 396 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#749,692
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#73
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,943
of 321,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#4
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.