↓ Skip to main content

Depression, smoking, physical inactivity and season independently associated with midnight salivary cortisol in type 1 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Endocrine Disorders, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Depression, smoking, physical inactivity and season independently associated with midnight salivary cortisol in type 1 diabetes
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6823-14-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva O Melin, Maria Thunander, Mona Landin-Olsson, Magnus Hillman, Hans O Thulesius

Abstract

Disturbances of the circadian rhythm of cortisol secretion are associated with depression, coronary calcification, and higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.The primary aim of this study was to test the associations between midnight salivary cortisol (MSC), depression and HbA1c, and control for behavioural, environmental and intra individual factors with possible impact on cortisol secretion, like smoking, physical inactivity, season, medication, diabetes duration, severe hypoglycemia episodes, age and gender in patients with type 1 diabetes. Secondary aims were to present MSC levels for a reference group of non-depressed type 1 diabetes patients with a healthy life style (physically active and non-smoking), and to explore seasonal variations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 170 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 44 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Psychology 17 10%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 59 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,200,249
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#334
of 745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,253
of 225,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.