↓ Skip to main content

Forest biomass change estimated from height change in interferometric SAR height models

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forest biomass change estimated from height change in interferometric SAR height models
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13021-014-0005-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svein Solberg, Erik Næsset, Terje Gobakken, Ole-Martin Bollandsås

Abstract

There is a need for new satellite remote sensing methods for monitoring tropical forest carbon stocks. Advanced RADAR instruments on board satellites can contribute with novel methods. RADARs can see through clouds, and furthermore, by applying stereo RADAR imaging we can measure forest height and its changes. Such height changes are related to carbon stock changes in the biomass. We here apply data from the current Tandem-X satellite mission, where two RADAR equipped satellites go in close formation providing stereo imaging. We combine that with similar data acquired with one of the space shuttles in the year 2000, i.e. the so-called SRTM mission. We derive height information from a RADAR image pair using a method called interferometry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 30 36%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Engineering 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,507,922
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#79
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,348
of 238,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.