↓ Skip to main content

Validating the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validating the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS)
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keyvan Molanorouzi, Selina Khoo, Tony Morris

Abstract

Although there is abundant evidence to recommend a physically active lifestyle, adult physical activity (PA) levels have declined over the past two decades. In order to understand why this happens, numerous studies have been conducted to uncover the reasons for people's participation in PA. Often, the measures used were not broad enough to reflect all the reasons for participation in PA. The Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS) was created to be a comprehensive tool measuring motives for participating in PA. This 40-item scale related to participation in sport and PA is designed for adolescents and adults. Five items constitute each of the eight sub-scales (mastery, enjoyment, psychological condition, physical condition, appearance, other's expectations, affiliation, competition/ego) reflecting motives for participation in PA that can be categorized as features of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation based on self-determination theory. The aim of the current study was to validate the PALMS in the cultural context of Malaysia, including to assess how well the PALMS captures the same information as the Recreational Exercise Motivation Measure (REMM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Unknown 258 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 18%
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Researcher 13 5%
Lecturer 13 5%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 66 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 49 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Social Sciences 24 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Psychology 20 8%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 75 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,179,664
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,260
of 14,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,778
of 237,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#171
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.