You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: clinical‐biomarker correlations and current concepts in pathogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Neurodegeneration, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1326-9-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sam Gandy, Milos D Ikonomovic, Effie Mitsis, Gregory Elder, Stephen T Ahlers, Jeffrey Barth, James R Stone, Steven T DeKosky |
| Abstract |
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a recently revived term used to describe a neurodegenerative process that occurs as a long term complication of repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Corsellis provided one of the classic descriptions of CTE in boxers under the name "dementia pugilistica" (DP). Much recent attention has been drawn to the apparent association of CTE with contact sports (football, soccer, hockey) and with frequent battlefield exposure to blast waves generated by improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Recently, a promising serum biomarker has been identified by measurement of serum levels of the neuronal microtubule associated protein tau. New positron emission tomography (PET) ligands (e.g., [18 F] T807) that identify brain tauopathy have been successfully deployed for the in vitro and in vivo detection of presumptive tauopathy in the brains of subjects with clinically probable CTE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 21% |
| Unknown | 43 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 32 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Psychology | 16 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,542,502
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#336
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,863
of 259,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.