↓ Skip to main content

BMC Anesthesiology reviewer acknowledgement, 2013

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BMC Anesthesiology reviewer acknowledgement, 2013
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-14-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas A Rowles

Abstract

The editors of BMC Anesthesiology would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed their time to the journal in Volume 13 (2013).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,378,085
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#982
of 1,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,984
of 313,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.