↓ Skip to main content

Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of benefit of so-called lung-protective ventilation settings in patients under general anesthesia for surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of benefit of so-called lung-protective ventilation settings in patients under general anesthesia for surgery
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ary Serpa Neto, Sabrine NT Hemmes, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Paolo Pelosi, Marcus J Schultz

Abstract

Almost all patients under general anesthesia for surgery need mechanical ventilation. The harmful effects of short-term intra-operative ventilation on pulmonary integrity are increasingly recognized. Recent investigations suggest protection against so-called ventilation-associated lung injury with the use of lower tidal volumes and/or the use of higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This review and meta-analysis will evaluate the effects of these protective measures on pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications, and try to discriminate the effects of lower tidal volumes from those of higher levels of PEEP.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Israel 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Postgraduate 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%