You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of myocardial crypts in a large retrospective cohort study by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0066-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas Child, Tina Muhr, Eva Sammut, Darius Dabir, Eduardo Arroyo Ucar, Tootie Bueser, Jaswinder Gill, Gerry Carr-White, Eike Nagel, Valentina O Puntmann |
| Abstract |
Myocardial crypts are discrete clefts or fissures in otherwise compacted myocardium of the left ventricle (LV). Recent reports suggest a higher prevalence of crypts in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and also within small samples of genotype positive but phenotype negative relatives. The presence of a crypt has been suggested to be a predictor of gene carrier status. However, the prevalence and clinical significance of crypts in the general population is unclear. We aimed to determine the prevalence of myocardial crypts in a large cohort of subjects using clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Germany | 6 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 62% |
| Scientists | 16 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 55% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2021.
All research outputs
#804,816
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#20
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,771
of 247,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.