You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels on food purchases: protocol for the Starlight randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-968 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ekaterina Volkova, Bruce Neal, Mike Rayner, Boyd Swinburn, Helen Eyles, Yannan Jiang, Jo Michie, Cliona Ni Mhurchu |
| Abstract |
Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels are better understood than non-interpretive labels. However, robust evidence on the effects of such labels on consumer food purchases in the real-world is lacking. Our aim is to assess the effects of two interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels, compared with a non-interpretive label, on the healthiness of consumer food purchases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 4 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 14% |
| Psychology | 16 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#5,592,536
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,530
of 14,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,536
of 249,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#91
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.