You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of different lumbar belt designs on the lumbopelvic rhythm in healthy subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Larivière, Jean-Maxime Caron, Richard Preuss, Hakim Mecheri |
| Abstract |
Research suggests that in some patients with low back pain, lumbar belts (LB) may derive secondary prophylactic benefits. It remains to be determined, however, which patients are most likely to benefit from prophylactic LB use, and which LB design is optimal for this purpose. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different lumbar belts designs on range of motion and lumbopelvic rhythm. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Thailand | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,942,562
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,376
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,217
of 250,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#28
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.