↓ Skip to main content

Molecular mimicry, inflammatory bowel disease, and the vaccine safety debate

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular mimicry, inflammatory bowel disease, and the vaccine safety debate
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0166-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susy Yusung, Jonathan Braun

Abstract

Preventive immunization has provided one of the major advances in population health during the past century. However, a surprising cultural phenomenon is the emergence of concerns about immunization safety, in part due to prominently controversial biomedical studies. One ongoing theoretical safety concern is the possibility of human molecular mimicry by measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) antigens. The study of Polymeros et al. in this BMC Medicine presents a systematic evaluation and refutation of this safety concern. This provides significant new scientific evidence in support of the safety of pediatric vaccines, which will inform the ongoing policy and cultural understanding of this important public health measure.Please see related research article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/139/abstract.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,065,195
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,915
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,532
of 260,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#71
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.