You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Component costs of foodborne illness: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-509 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taylor McLinden, Jan M Sargeant, M Kate Thomas, Andrew Papadopoulos, Aamir Fazil |
| Abstract |
Governments require high-quality scientific evidence to prioritize resource allocation and the cost-of-illness (COI) methodology is one technique used to estimate the economic burden of a disease. However, variable cost inventories make it difficult to interpret and compare costs across multiple studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 21% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,011,271
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,467
of 14,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,770
of 226,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#88
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.