You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meghan A Bohren, Erin C Hunter, Heather M Munthe-Kaas, João Paulo Souza, Joshua P Vogel, A Metin Gülmezoglu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 11 | 26% |
| Canada | 4 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Senegal | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 64% |
| Scientists | 11 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,009 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 998 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 220 | 22% |
| Researcher | 128 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 55 | 5% |
| Other | 151 | 15% |
| Unknown | 285 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 246 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 204 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 113 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 2% |
| Psychology | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 91 | 9% |
| Unknown | 312 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#581,649
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#33
of 1,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,694
of 261,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.