↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenesis and potential relative risk factors of diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenesis and potential relative risk factors of diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0634-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong-Mou Zhao, Jia-Yu Diao, Xiao-Jun Liang, Feng Zhang, Ding-Jun Hao

Abstract

Diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy (DNOAP) is an uncommon, but with considerable morbidity and mortality rates, complication of diabetes. The real pathogenesis is still unclear. The two popular theories are the neuro-vascular theory and neuro-traumatic theory. Most theories and pathways focused on the uncontrolled inflammations that resulted in the final common pathway, receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) axis, for the decreased bone density in DNOAP with an osteoclast and osteoblast imbalance. However, the RANKL/OPG pathway does not explain all the changes, other pathways and factors also play roles. A lot of DNOAP potential relative risk factors were evaluated and reported in the literature, including age, gender, weight, duration and type of diabetes, bone mineral density, peripheral neuropathy and arterial disease, trauma history, and some others. However, most of them are still in debates. Future studies focus on the pathogenesis of DNOAP are still needed, especially for the genetic factors. And, the relationship between DNOAP and those potential relative risk factors are still need to further clarify.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Unspecified 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 27%