↓ Skip to main content

Effects of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee on biological risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
62 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee on biological risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole M Wedick, Aoife M Brennan, Qi Sun, Frank B Hu, Christos S Mantzoros, Rob M van Dam

Abstract

Coffee consumption has been associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes in prospective cohort studies, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of regular and decaffeinated coffee on biological risk factors for type 2 diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 24%
Student > Master 27 16%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Other 9 5%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Chemistry 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 30 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#297,139
of 19,047,010 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#100
of 1,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,178
of 108,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,047,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them