↓ Skip to main content

Effects of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee on biological risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
58 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee on biological risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole M Wedick, Aoife M Brennan, Qi Sun, Frank B Hu, Christos S Mantzoros, Rob M van Dam

Abstract

Coffee consumption has been associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes in prospective cohort studies, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of regular and decaffeinated coffee on biological risk factors for type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 20%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 10 5%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 41 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 55 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#461,981
of 25,205,261 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#146
of 1,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,639
of 131,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.