↓ Skip to main content

The association between diabetes and dermal microvascular dysfunction non-invasively assessed by laser Doppler with local thermal hyperemia: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between diabetes and dermal microvascular dysfunction non-invasively assessed by laser Doppler with local thermal hyperemia: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12933-016-0487-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dagmar Fuchs, Pepijn P. Dupon, Laura A. Schaap, Richard Draijer

Abstract

Diabetes and cardiovascular disease develop in concert with metabolic abnormalities mirroring and causing changes in the vasculature, particularly the microcirculation. The microcirculation can be affected in different parts of the body of which the skin is the most easily accessible tissue. The association between diabetes and dermal microvascular dysfunction has been investigated in observational studies. However, the strength of the association is unknown. Therefore we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis on the association between diabetes and dermal microvascular dysfunction as assessed by laser Doppler/laser speckle contrast imaging with local thermal hyperaemia as non-invasive indicator of microvascular functionality. PubMed and Ovid were  systematically searched for eligible studies through March 2015. During the first selection, studies were included if they were performed in humans and were related to diabetes or glucose metabolism disorders and to dermal microcirculation. During the second step we selected studies based on the measurement technique, measurement location (arm or leg) and the inclusion of a healthy control group. A random effects model was used with the standardised mean difference as outcome measure. Calculations and imputation of data were done according to the Cochrane Handbook. Of the 1445 studies found in the first search, thirteen cross-sectional studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising a total of 857 subjects. Resting blood flow was similar between healthy control subjects and diabetes patients. In contrast, the microvascular response to local skin heating was reduced in diabetic patients compared to healthy control subjects [pooled effect of -0.78 standardised mean difference (95% CI -1.06, -0.51)]. This effect is considered large according to Cohen's effect size definition. The variability in effect size was high (heterogeneity 69%, p < 0.0001). However, subgroup analysis revealed no difference between the type and duration of diabetes and other health related factors, indicating that diabetes per se causes the microvascular dysfunction. Our meta-analysis shows that diabetes is associated with a large reduction of dermal microvascular function in diabetic patients. The local thermal hyperaemia methodology may become a valuable non-invasive tool for diagnosis and assessing progress of diabetes-related microvascular complications, but standardisation of the technique and quality of study conduct is urgently required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 33 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 39%
Engineering 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,688,569
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#879
of 1,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,866
of 419,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.