↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and demographic correlates of medication and visit adherence in a large randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and demographic correlates of medication and visit adherence in a large randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1471-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeff Whittle, José-Miguel Yamal, Jeffrey D. Williamson, Charles E. Ford, Jeffrey L. Probstfield, Barbara L. Beard, Horia Marginean, Bruce P. Hamilton, Pamela S. Suhan, Barry R. Davis, on behalf of the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group

Abstract

Patient characteristics are associated with adherence, which has implications for planning clinical research or designing payment systems that reward superior outcomes. It is unclear to what extent clinician efforts to improve adherence can attenuate these associations. To identify factors predicting visit and medication adherence in settings designed to optimize adherence, we did a retrospective analysis of participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT recruited participants at 632 sites in North America, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands for random assignment to antihypertensive treatment with amlodipine, chlorthalidone, or lisinopril. Site investigators reported clinic characteristics at the time they applied to participate in the study and research coordinators used standardized methods to measure patient characteristics. We defined adequate visit adherence as attending at least 80 % of scheduled visits; adequate medication adherence was defined as taking 80 % or more of the randomly assigned medication at all study visits. The 31,250 ALLHAT participants eligible for the visit adherence analysis attended 78.5 % of scheduled study visits; 68.9 % attended more than 80 % of scheduled visits. Clinic setting was predictive of both forms of adherence; adherence was worst at private clinics; clinics that enrolled more study participants had superior adherence. Adjusting for clinic characteristics and clinical factors, women, younger participants, Blacks and smokers were less likely to have adequate visit adherence. Among the 28,967 participants eligible for the medication adherence analysis, 21,261 (73.4 %) reported adequate medication adherence. In adjusted analyses, younger and less educated participants, Blacks, and smokers were less likely to report adequate adherence. Participant demographics were associated with adherence despite strenuous efforts to optimize adherence. Our results could inform decisions by researchers planning trials and policymakers designing payment systems. NCT00000542 . Registered 27 October 1999.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 39 34%