↓ Skip to main content

PATTERN: Pain Assessment for paTients who can’t TEll using Restricted Boltzmann machiNe

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PATTERN: Pain Assessment for paTients who can’t TEll using Restricted Boltzmann machiNe
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12911-016-0317-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Yang, Shuang Wang, Xiaoqian Jiang, Samuel Cheng, Hyeon-Eui Kim

Abstract

Accurately assessing pain for those who cannot make self-report of pain, such as minimally responsive or severely brain-injured patients, is challenging. In this paper, we attempted to address this challenge by answering the following questions: (1) if the pain has dependency structures in electronic signals and if so, (2) how to apply this pattern in predicting the state of pain. To this end, we have been investigating and comparing the performance of several machine learning techniques. We first adopted different strategies, in which the collected original n-dimensional numerical data were converted into binary data. Pain states are represented in binary format and bound with above binary features to construct (n + 1) -dimensional data. We then modeled the joint distribution over all variables in this data using the Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM). Seventy-eight pain data items were collected. Four individuals with the number of recorded labels larger than 1000 were used in the experiment. Number of avaliable data items for the four patients varied from 22 to 28. Discriminant RBM achieved better accuracy in all four experiments. The experimental results show that RBM models the distribution of our binary pain data well. We showed that discriminant RBM can be used in a classification task, and the initial result is advantageous over other classifiers such as support vector machine (SVM) using PCA representation and the LDA discriminant method.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Engineering 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%