↓ Skip to main content

Detection of a novel circovirus PCV3 in pigs with cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of a novel circovirus PCV3 in pigs with cardiac and multi-systemic inflammation
Published in
Virology Journal, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12985-016-0642-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tung Gia Phan, Federico Giannitti, Stephanie Rossow, Douglas Marthaler, Todd P. Knutson, Linlin Li, Xutao Deng, Talita Resende, Fabio Vannucci, Eric Delwart

Abstract

Porcine circovirus 2 causes different clinical syndromes resulting in a significant economic loss in the pork industry. Three pigs with unexplained cardiac and multi-organ inflammation that tested negative for PCV2 and other known porcine pathogens were further analyzed. Histology was used to identify microscopic lesions in multiple tissues. Metagenomics was used to detect viral sequences in tissue homogenates. In situ hybridization was used to detect viral RNA expression in cardiac tissue. In all three cases we characterized the genome of a new circovirus we called PCV3 with a replicase and capsid proteins showing 55 and 35 % identities to the genetically-closest proteins from a bat-feces associated circovirus and were even more distant to those of porcine circovirus 1 and 2. Common microscopic lesions included non-suppurative myocarditis and/or cardiac arteriolitis. Viral mRNA was detected intralesionally in cardiac cells. Deep sequencing in tissues also revealed the presence of porcine astrovirus 4 in all three animals as well as rotavirus A, porcine cytomegalovirus and porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus in individual cases. The pathogenicity and molecular epidemiology of this new circovirus, alone or in the context of co-infections, warrants further investigations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 47 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 55 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 52 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,540,801
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#909
of 3,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,757
of 311,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.