You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A practice-based analysis of combinations of diseases in patients aged 65 or older in primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-159 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pauline Boeckxstaens, Wim Peersman, Gwendolyn Goubin, Souhila Ghali, Jan De Maeseneer, Guy Brusselle, An De Sutter |
Abstract |
Most evidence on chronic diseases has been collected for single diseases whereas in reality, patients often suffer from more than one condition. There is a growing need for evidence-based answers to multimorbidity, especially in primary care settings where family doctors (FD's) provide comprehensive care for a high variety of chronic conditions. This study aimed to define which disease and problem combinations would be most relevant and useful for the development of guidelines to manage multimorbidity in primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 26% |
Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,092
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,382
of 263,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.