↓ Skip to main content

Patient delay in cancer diagnosis: what do we really mean and can we be more specific?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient delay in cancer diagnosis: what do we really mean and can we be more specific?
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-387
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Mary Dobson, Andrew James Russell, Greg Paul Rubin

Abstract

Early diagnosis is a key focus of cancer control because of its association with survival. Delays in diagnosis can occur throughout the diagnostic pathway, within any one of its three component intervals: the patient interval, the primary care interval and the secondary care interval.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Student > Master 17 13%
Researcher 15 12%
Other 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 34%
Psychology 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 36 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,983,787
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,732
of 7,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,198
of 243,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#44
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.