↓ Skip to main content

Deep brain stimulation of the basolateral amygdala for treatment-refractory combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial with blinded…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep brain stimulation of the basolateral amygdala for treatment-refractory combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial with blinded, staggered onset of stimulation
Published in
Trials, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralph J Koek, Jean-Philippe Langevin, Scott E Krahl, Hovsep J Kosoyan, Holly N Schwartz, James WY Chen, Rebecca Melrose, Mark J Mandelkern, David Sultzer

Abstract

Combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) involves significant suffering, impairments in social and occupational functioning, substance use and medical comorbidity, and increased mortality from suicide and other causes. Many veterans continue to suffer despite current treatments. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown promise in refractory movement disorders, depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder, with deep brain targets chosen by integration of clinical and neuroimaging literature. The basolateral amygdala (BLn) is an optimal target for high-frequency DBS in PTSD based on neurocircuitry findings from a variety of perspectives. DBS of the BLn was validated in a rat model of PTSD by our group, and limited data from humans support the potential safety and effectiveness of BLn DBS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 340 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 69 20%
Unknown 73 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 17%
Neuroscience 39 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 97 28%