You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic organization of eukaryotic tRNAs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-11-270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clara Bermudez-Santana, Camille Stephan-Otto Attolini, Toralf Kirsten, Jan Engelhardt, Sonja J Prohaska, Stephan Steigele, Peter F Stadler |
| Abstract |
Surprisingly little is known about the organization and distribution of tRNA genes and tRNA-related sequences on a genome-wide scale. While tRNA gene complements are usually reported in passing as part of genome annotation efforts, and peculiar features such as the tandem arrangements of tRNA gene in Entamoeba histolytica have been described in some detail, systematic comparative studies are rare and mostly restricted to bacteria. We therefore set out to survey the genomic arrangement of tRNA genes and pseudogenes in a wide range of eukaryotes to identify common patterns and taxon-specific peculiarities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 22% |
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,264
of 10,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,994
of 95,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#44
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.