You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules and cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-191 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tsai-Wei Huang, Jun-Hung Lai, Mei-Yi Wu, Shiah-Lian Chen, Chih-Hsiung Wu, Ka-Wai Tam |
| Abstract |
Given the uncertainties regarding thyroid nodule assessment and management, physicians require systematically and transparently developed recommendations. This systematic review assesses the quality and consistency of the recommendations of international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules and cancer to assist physicians in making appropriate recommendations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 31% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,772,099
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,218
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,340
of 200,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.