You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome: a case report and three-decade review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-515 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wen Meng, Hong-Hong Zhu, Hu Li, Guoqing Wang, Dongshan Wei, Xing Feng |
Abstract |
No case of solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome has been reported in China. This study was to report a rare repeatedly recurrent case of solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome diagnosed in China and a three-decade literature review of solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 20% |
Researcher | 6 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 73% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,942,562
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,097
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,823
of 230,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#45
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.